Refining Nigeria’s Oil Sector: Legal Reforms and the Path to Increased Domestic Production

Refining Nigerias Oil Sector Legal Reforms and the Path to Increased Domestic Production

Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil producer, faces a paradoxical challenge in its oil and gas sector. Despite possessing vast crude oil reserves, the country has long grappled with developing a robust domestic refining industry. This disparity between resource abundance and refining capacity has created a striking imbalance in Nigeria’s energy landscape.

Recent statistics paint a stark picture: while Nigeria ranks among the world’s top oil producers, its functional refining capacity remains critically limited. Consequently, the nation finds itself in the peculiar position of exporting crude oil while heavily relying on imported refined petroleum products to meet domestic demand.

The enactment of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) in 2021 aimed to modernize the sector’s regulatory framework, addressing longstanding issues and paving the way for increased domestic refining capacity. However, recent developments, including the federal government’s intervention in crude oil supply for the Dangote Refinery, highlight ongoing challenges and potential areas for further legal reform.

This article explores the intricacies of these challenges, examines recent policy shifts, and proposes potential avenues for legal reform to foster a more robust and self-sufficient refining industry in Nigeria.

Recent Developments: A Step Forward

On July 29, 2024, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) approved a proposal directing the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Limited to sell crude oil to Dangote Petroleum Refinery and other refineries in naira. This decision, aimed at ensuring stability in fuel pump prices and the naira-dollar exchange rate, represents a significant shift in policy.

Key points of this decision include:

  1. The sale of 450,000 barrels of crude oil meant for domestic consumption will be offered in naira to Nigerian refineries, using the Dangote refinery as a pilot.
  2. The African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) will facilitate the trade between Dangote and NNPC as the lead settlement bank.
  3. This move is expected to reduce pressure on foreign exchange and potentially stabilize fuel prices.

While this decision addresses immediate concerns, particularly for the Dangote Refinery, it also raises questions about the need for broader legal reforms within the PIA framework.

The PIA Framework and Persistent Challenges

The PIA, enacted in 2021, was designed to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for the oil and gas sector. However, its implementation has revealed potential shortcomings, particularly in supporting domestic refining. Section 109 of the PIA, which deals with domestic crude oil supply obligations, has been a focal point of these challenges.

Key Provisions and Their Limitations

Section 109(3) of the PIA mandates that:

  1. a) Crude oil may only be sold to holders of crude oil refining licenses whose refineries are in operation. b) The supply of crude oil shall be commercially negotiated between the supplier and the customer, having regard to the prevailing international market price for similar grades of crude oil. c) Holders of petroleum prospecting licenses and petroleum mining leases shall be mandated to dedicate a portion of their crude oil production to the domestic market.

While these provisions aim to support domestic refineries, the requirement for commercial negotiation at international prices has created challenges. The recent government intervention, while addressing immediate concerns, suggests that the current framework may not be sufficient to fully support the growth of domestic refining capacity.

The Case for Further Legal Reform

Despite the recent resolution of crude supply issues for the Dangote Refinery, several factors indicate a continued need for legal reform of the PIA:

  1. Broader Industry Support: While the current intervention benefits the Dangote Refinery, a more comprehensive legal framework is needed to support all domestic refineries, both existing and future.
  2. Long-term Sustainability: The government’s intervention, while welcome, is essentially a stopgap measure. A more sustainable solution would involve amending the PIA to provide clearer, more supportive provisions for domestic refineries.
  3. Pricing Mechanism: The PIA’s requirement for commercial negotiation at international prices may need revision to ensure domestic refineries can access crude at competitive rates without constant government intervention.
  4. Regulatory Alignment: The roles and actions of regulatory bodies like the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) should be more clearly defined and aligned to support domestic refining.
  5. Import Regulation: The continued issuance of import licenses for refined products may need to be more strategically regulated to support domestic refining operations.
  6. Quality Standards: Enforcement of quality standards for both imported and domestically refined products needs to be strengthened and clearly outlined in the legal framework.

 Conclusion

While the recent government intervention in crude oil supply for domestic refineries is a positive step, it also highlights the need for more comprehensive legal reforms. The PIA, as it stands, may not provide sufficient support for the development of a robust domestic refining industry in Nigeria.

Future amendments to the PIA should consider:

  • Implementing a more structured domestic crude supply obligation
  • Revising pricing mechanisms to ensure fair access to crude for domestic refineries
  • Aligning regulatory actions more closely to support domestic refining
  • Introducing tax incentives for local refining
  • Enhancing antitrust measures to prevent monopolistic practices

These reforms would create a more supportive legal environment for domestic refineries, reducing reliance on ad hoc government interventions and fostering the long-term growth of Nigeria’s refining capacity. As Nigeria continues to navigate its energy future, the legal framework must evolve to meet the changing needs of the industry and the nation.

 

Contributors

Dr. Olisa Agbakoba SAN

Senior Partner
Collins Okeke

Associate Partner