The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Environmental and Community Disputes
The escalating global challenge of environmental and community disputes requires innovative conflict resolution strategies. Unregulated industrial activity, particularly resource exploitation, fuels ecological degradation, leading to armed conflict, political instability, and widespread insecurity.[1] Despite international protocols aimed at curbing environmentally damaging practices by states, corporations, and individuals, environmental stress persists, resulting in protracted conflicts and significant loss of life and property.[2] While developed nations demonstrate progress in regulating industry and holding multinational corporations accountable, many developing countries grapple with a cycle of resource-based conflicts.[3]
Africa, particularly, faces a persistent problem of environmental degradation, with consequences ranging from armed conflict and health hazards to underdevelopment and loss of life.[4] The continent’s vulnerability is exacerbated by economic dependence, poverty, corruption, and weak regulatory frameworks, often leaving it ill-equipped to hold multinational corporations accountable for their actions.[5] This is acutely evident in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, where decades of oil exploration have resulted in severe environmental degradation, health crises, displacement, loss of life, and widespread insecurity, fueling calls for resource control and even secession.[6] Despite government initiatives, resource-related environmental degradation in the Niger Delta remains a significant and persistent challenge.
The detrimental impacts of oil exploration in the Niger Delta highlight the limitations of traditional litigation in resolving complex environmental disputes.[7] The adversarial nature of traditional legal processes, coupled with high costs and lengthy timelines, often proves inadequate. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), particularly arbitration, offers a more efficient, inclusive, and sustainable approach to resolving these multifaceted challenges, including oil spills, pollution crises, land-use conflicts, and conservation issues.[8]
Environmental and Community Disputes: Scope and Challenges
Environmental disputes often involve pollution, deforestation, climate change impacts, and biodiversity loss, while community disputes frequently arise from conflicts over land rights, access to natural resources, or the impact of industrial projects. In many cases, these disputes:
- Involve multiple stakeholders, including corporations, governments, communities, and environmental groups.
- Are technically complex, requiring expertise in environmental science, law, and policy.
- Have long-term implications for public health, livelihoods, and ecosystems.
The Director: Mineral Development, Gauteng v Save the Vaal Environment 1999 2 SA 719 (SCA) para 719B-719C[9] underscored the environmental risks associated with mining, noting that “…the application of the [audi alteram partem] rule is indicated by virtue of the enormous damage mining can do to the environment and ecological systems. What has to be ensured when application is made for the issuing of a mining licence is that development which meets present needs will take place without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
However, litigation, while sometimes necessary, can intensify conflicts by fostering adversarial stances. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and arbitration, on the other hand, provide avenues for collaborative dispute resolution and the attainment of outcomes that reconcile competing interests.
Role of ADR and Arbitration in Resolving Environmental and Community Disputes
-
Flexibility and Customisation
ADR methods, including mediation and arbitration, are tailored to the specific circumstances of disputes. They allow stakeholders to design solutions that reflect the unique social, economic, and environmental dimensions of the case.
-
Technical Expertise
ADR processes can incorporate environmental experts, enabling informed decisions that consider scientific evidence and policy frameworks. Arbitrators or mediators with expertise in environmental law are often better equipped to understand and resolve disputes than generalist judges.
-
Confidentiality
ADR proceedings are private, helping parties address sensitive issues without public or media scrutiny. This is particularly important in high-stakes environmental disputes involving corporate reputations.
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Timeliness
ADR is generally faster and less expensive than litigation, which is critical for urgent environmental disputes where delays can lead to irreversible ecological harm.
-
Relationship Preservation
Unlike litigation, which often damages relationships, ADR fosters collaboration and helps preserve long-term partnerships between parties, such as between corporations and host communities.
Global Examples of ADR in Environmental Law
Despite the complexity and nature of environmental issues, there are numerous examples demonstrating the application of ADR processes. The embedding of ADR processes in international Conventions is one example of its global relevance. For example, Art 11(2) of the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer in resolving a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention states, ‘If the parties concerned cannot reach agreement by negotiation, they may jointly seek the good offices of, or request mediation by, a third party’.[10] This is a necessary step before parties to the dispute are able to submit the dispute to arbitration or the International Court of Justice according to Art 11(3) of the Convention.[11] Also the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development envisages the use of ADR mechanisms in managing environmental conflicts. Principle 10 of the Declaration stipulates as follows:[12]
“Environmental issues are best handled with the participation of all concerned citizens, at the relevant level. At the national level, each individual shall have appropriate access to information concerning the environment that is held by public authorities, including information on hazardous materials and activities in their communities, and the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes. States shall facilitate and encourage public awareness and participation by making information widely available. Effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings, including redress and remedy, shall be provided (Emphasis added).”
The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change provides a compelling recent example of ADR on a global scale.[13] Negotiations involving 195 countries resulted in a landmark agreement on emissions limits and collaborative action to combat climate change. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hailed its adoption as a “monumental victory for people and the planet,” signifying a significant step towards global environmental cooperation.[14]
The Niger Delta Oil Spill and ADR
The Niger Delta in Nigeria has witnessed decades of environmental degradation due to oil spills, gas flaring, and industrial pollution caused by multinational oil companies. These activities have devastated ecosystems, displaced communities, and sparked violent conflicts.[15]
Challenges in Litigation
- Lengthy court processes have delayed justice for affected communities.
- Limited access to legal resources has placed local populations at a disadvantage.
Application of ADR
- Mediation: In resolving disputes between oil companies and host communities, mediation has been employed to negotiate compensation, environmental remediation, and corporate social responsibility initiatives. For instance, Shell Petroleum Development Company[16] and other multi nationals and national companies engaged in mediation with communities over spill-related compensation claims.[17]
- Arbitration: Arbitration has been used in cases where contractual agreements between oil companies and the Nigerian government include arbitration clauses for resolving disputes. This method has facilitated binding resolutions without resorting to protracted litigation.
Case Studies from Other Countries
- Ghana
In Ghana, disputes over mining and logging operations impacting local communities and forests have been resolved using ADR.[18] Mediation has been utilized to address grievances over compensation, land rights, and environmental restoration, enabling peaceful resolutions that involve all stakeholders.[19] - South Africa
South Africa has adopted ADR mechanisms in resolving disputes over mining activities and water resource management.[20] For instance, community mediation has been employed to address conflicts between mining companies and indigenous populations, promoting dialogue and equitable solutions.[21] - India
India has extensively used ADR for environmental disputes, particularly in cases involving large infrastructure projects.[22] The Narmada River dispute over dam construction saw ADR processes help balance developmental needs with environmental and social concerns. Specialized environmental tribunals have also incorporated ADR techniques to expedite resolutions. - United Kingdom
In the UK, ADR has been utilized in environmental disputes involving land use, conservation, and pollution.[23] For instance, mediation has been used in disputes over wind farm developments, ensuring that community concerns about noise and landscape impact are addressed alongside renewable energy goals. - United States
The United States has seen widespread use of ADR in resolving environmental disputes, particularly under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) programs.[24] Mediation has been instrumental in settling Superfund site clean-up disputes, where multiple stakeholders must agree on remediation plans and cost-sharing arrangements.
Examples of ADR’s Effectiveness[25]
- Soweto Waste Management Dispute, South Africa
Mediation was used to resolve a conflict between local authorities and informal waste pickers in Soweto, leading to agreements on access to recycling facilities and improved working conditions. - Navajo Nation, USA
In the USA, ADR was employed to resolve disputes over uranium mining on Navajo land, resulting in settlements that included compensation and environmental restoration measures.
Challenges of Using ADR in Environmental and Community Disputes[26]
- Power Imbalances
Wealthy corporations may dominate negotiations, undermining the fairness of ADR processes unless safeguards are in place. - Enforceability of Agreements
Mediated agreements are not legally binding unless formalized, making enforcement dependent on the goodwill of parties. - Access to ADR Mechanisms
Marginalized communities may lack awareness or resources to effectively engage in ADR processes. - Potential Compromises
Critics argue that ADR’s emphasis on compromise may dilute strict enforcement of environmental laws.
Conclusion
The success of ADR and arbitration in resolving environmental and community disputes is clear they foster dialogue, ease tensions, and help craft solutions that last. But to truly make a difference, these mechanisms need to be more than just options; they must become part of how we approach environmental justice from the start. Governments should take the lead by weaving ADR into national environmental policies, ensuring that communities, corporations, and governments alike have access to fair and timely resolution processes before turning to the courts. Specialized environmental ADR bodies made up of legal experts, scientists, and local voices could offer the nuanced solutions these complex issues demand.[27]
Corporations, too, have a role to play. Those profiting from natural resources should be required to include ADR frameworks in their agreements with host communities, offering a fair path for resolving disputes without dragging conflicts through years of litigation. Building local capacity is just as important training mediators, setting up accessible dispute centers, and using technology to break down barriers that often leave affected communities unheard.
At its core, this isn’t just about resolving conflicts it’s about restoring trust, protecting livelihoods, and ensuring that economic development doesn’t come at the expense of the environment or human dignity. If we’re serious about building a sustainable future, we must rethink how we approach environmental disputes. ADR isn’t just a tool it’s a chance to turn conflict into cooperation and pave the way for real, lasting change. The time to act is now.
References
[1] Barnett, 2019; Ide et al., 2021; Uexkull & Buhaug, 2021; UNEP, 2022
[2] Nina Von and Halvard, 2021; UNEP, 2021
[3] Brock, 2012; Deligiannis, 2012; Nina Von and Halvard, 2021; Calel and Dechezlepretre, 2016; Dechezlepretre and Sato, 2017; Detges, 2017
[4] Akokpari, 2007; Purkitt, 2010; Freeman, 2017
[5]Maphosa, 2012; Adonteng-Kissi, 2017; Abdul Kareem et al., 2021; Langnel et al., 2021
[6]Omeje, 2004; Afinotan and Ojakorotu, 2009; Obi, 2010; Mähler, 2012; Aghalino and Okolie-Osemene, 2014; Mateos, 2021; Adekola and Gordon, 2011; Ikelegbe and Omukoro, 2016; Ikelegbe and Okpukri, 2012; Adonteng-Kissi et al., 2021
[7] Watts, M. J. (2004). Resource Curse? Governmentality, Oil and Power in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Geopolitics.
[8] Grad. F.P., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in Environmental Law.’ Columbia Journal of Environmental Law Volume: 14, Issue 1
[9] Director: Mineral Development, Gauteng v Save the Vaal Environment 1999 2 SA 719 (SCA) para 719B-719C
[10]Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer opened for signature 22 March 1985, 1513 UNTS 293 (entered into force 22 September 1988) art 11(2)
[11]Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer opened for signature 22 March 1985, 1513 UNTS 293 (entered into force 22 September 1988) art 11(3).
[12]United Nations General Assembly., ‘Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.’ A/CONF. 151/26 (Vol.1)
[13]Key aspects of the Paris Agreement | UNFCCC access on 26th February 2025 from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement&ved=2ahUKEwiCia7U1e-LAxU_UkEAHUp-MF0QFnoECGIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1vcYXJS
[14]United Nations
https://www.un.org
The Paris Agreement
[15]UNEP Report https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/unep-ogoniland-oil-assessment-reveals-extent-environmental-contamination-and accessed 23rd February 2025.
[16]Shell and Milieudefensie settle long-running case over oil spills in Nigeria accessed on 9th February 2025 from https://www.shell.com.ng/media/2022-media-releases/shell-and-milieudefensie-settle-long-running-case-over-oil-spills-in-nigeria.html
[17]The Guardian News 5 Sep 2013 Shell to negotiate compensation for 2008 Nigeria oil spill access on 7 January 2025 from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/05/shell-nigeria-oil-spill
[18]Forest Carbon Partnership Facility
https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org
development of dispute resolution mechanism for redd+ in ghana …
[19]Minerals and Mining Act (Act 703), Section 26, Minerals and Mining Act (Act 703), Section 27 (1)
[20] L FerisI; LJ KotzéII (2014) The regulation of acid mine drainage in South Africa: law and governance perspectives, Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ) PER vol.17 n.5 Potchefstroom 2014
[21]Selina Kudzai Zhuwarara
(2023) Arbitration of Community Related Disputes in South Africa’s Mining Industry
February 2023 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96183-1_25-1
[22] Vishnu Vardhan, Hemalatha G (2023) Role of ADR in resolving dispute of Indian infrastructure sector Vol. 11 No. 3
[23] Lawrence Susskind
(2000) Mediating Land Use Disputes
January 2000
[24] Susan Raines and Rosemary O’Leary, Evaluating the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques and Processes in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Cases: Views of Agency Attorneys, 18 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 119 (2000) DOI: https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1554 Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol18/iss1/4
[25] Ibid
[26] Legal and Administrative Challenges of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation
[27]Ibid
Contributors
